What Comes Next in the Election of Bishops
In the opening days of the 2026 General Conference in Johannesburg, the Global Methodist Church took a concrete first step toward electing its first regular, full-time slate of bishops. On the qualifying ballot for the denomination's interim bishops, two of the six who were elected to interim service at the 2024 Convening General Conference crossed the three-fourths threshold of approval required to move forward. Bishops Carolyn Moore and John Pena Auta now advance to the main ballot, where the real work of election begins.
The moment carries weight beyond the arithmetic. When the GMC gathered in San José, Costa Rica in 2024, it elected six bishops — Carolyn Moore, Jeff Greenway, John Pena Auta, Kenneth Levingston, Kimba Evariste and Leah Hidde-Gregory — to two-year interim terms, a deliberate provision meant to leave room for additional annual conferences to join the Church before standard elections were held. Bishops Mark Webb and Scott Jones were appointed as full time bishops at Convening General Conference to facilitate the transition as the denomination got its feet on the ground. Bishop Eduard Khegay, another full time bishop, was received by the Assembly of Bishops in June of 2025 to serve newly formed annual conferences in Russia.
Johannesburg is where that season closes and a new one opens. For the first time, the Church will elect bishops to defined six-year terms, renewable once, and it will do so through a process built deliberately from the ground up.
Sunday’s qualifying ballot was a threshold, not an election. Under the “Book of Doctrines and Discipline,” no more than three of the six interim bishops may be carried forward to a full six-year term at this General Conference. To reach the main ballot at all, an interim bishop needed to earn the approval of three-fourths of the delegates. Delegates were free to vote for as many of the interim bishops as they wished; had more than three surpassed the threshold, only the three with the greatest support would have advanced. With two names clearing the mark, both move forward.
That result settles the qualifying question and turns the Conference's attention to the fuller slate of nominees who have come up through the new process — elders nominated by annual conference delegations, vetted and ranked by the area committees on episcopacy over the past several months, and if listed on a top five ranking, interviewed on video so delegates could come to know them before casting a vote.
Beginning Wednesday, the General Conference moves to the general ballot — the election of bishops to specific episcopal areas. This is the heart of the redesigned process, and it looks different from anything the Church has done before.
Each bishop is elected not to the episcopacy in the abstract, but to a particular episcopal area, each area comprising several annual conferences that may be non-contiguous and international in shape. Those areas were defined in May by a plenary body of lay and clergy members from each annual conference, and each area committee submitted a ranked list of the top five nominees it would recommend to serve its area.Those rankings, distributed to delegates by the end of July, are expected to weigh heavily as the balloting proceeds. Where the same nominee tops more than one area's list, the Global Episcopacy Committee has committed to issuing guidance to help delegates navigate the overlap.
The standard for election is significant support: a nominee must receive at least sixty percent of the plenary body's vote to be elected to an episcopal area. Delegates may not cast a vote for the same person in more than one area on the same ballot, and the two interim bishops who cleared the qualifying ballot now stand alongside the rest of the nominees on this general ballot, eligible for election to an area like any other. Delegates aren't just choosing who should be a bishop; they're choosing who goes where, one name per area per ballot.
Those elected will be consecrated in Johannesburg before the Conference concludes on September 5, and will begin their episcopal service sixty days after its close. The Conference also intends to honor the bishops whose service is drawing to an end.
The design is more complex than past practice, and by intention. It gives every annual conference a real voice in both the shape of the area it will help form and the leader who will serve it; it vets nominees in something closer to an interview than an acclamation; and it guards against any single block setting the outcome. Above all, it aims for a Spirit-led election worthy of the Church's calling. With 21 nominees standing for election, beginning Wednesday, the wider body will discern who is called to lead.
Related Posts








